Cisco Systems
ECHO in Context
  Echo in Context Teleconferences: 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1998 | 1997
 LEARN THE BASICS: Echocardiography | Doppler

HOME

TELECONFRENCES
2004
The Changing Left Ventricle

2003
Aortic Valve Disease: New Dimensions in Evaluation and Management

2002
Heart Failure: Echo's Role in and Emerging Health Crisis

2001
Chest Pain in Children & Adults: The Role of Echo

2000
Mitral Regurgitation: New Concept

1998
The Falling Left Ventricle: Diastolic & Systolic Function

1997
Changing the Outcome of Coronary Artery Disease
ECHO GRAND ROUNDS
Digital Integration
LEARN THE BASICS
Echocardiography
Doppler Echo
VIDEO ARCHIVES

Chest Pain in Children and Adults

Mitral Regurgitation: New Concepts

Diastolic and Systolic Function

Changing the Outcome of CAD

BROADCAST SUPPLEMENTS
2000 MV
2001 Chest Pain
2002 Heart Failure



Forward Blood Flow Profiles
Cardiac Output
Fig.3.4

Doppler echocardiography is useful for the determination of cardiac output; this is the volume of blood pumped by the left ventricle every minute and is expressed in liters per minute. The volume of blood ejected every systolic beat is called the stroke volume (Fig. 3.4) and is the basis for calculation of cardiac output according to the following equation:

Cardiac output =
stroke volume x heart rate

Fig.3.5

Doppler calculation of cardiac output is based on the assumption that the aorta is a cylinder during every systolic beat. This cylindrical flow volume may be determined if its area and its length are known. The area is determined from the two-dimensional echocardiographic image while the length is derived from the Doppler spectral recording (Fig. 3.5).

Fig.3.6

These relationships between area and flow velocity are shown schematically in Figure 3.6. Given identical volume of flow through a large cylinder (Fig. 3.6, left panel) and small cylinder (right panel), the velocities recorded by Doppler will vary considerably. The same volume through the larger cylinder will render a lower peak velocity (and small flow velocity integral) in comparison with the flow recorded through the smaller orifice. The flow velocity integral reflects the average velocity of the red cells during systole. Because the red cells are moving faster through the smaller cylinder, they travel farther. Thus, the Doppler recording of velocity relates to distance traveled.

Conceptually, derivation of cardiac output begins with the recognition that the volume of blood ejected every time the heart beats is first limited by the area of the aortic root (the area of the cylinder). While there remains some argument as to the precise point where this area is best determined from the two-dimensional echocardiographic image, most Doppler users measure the narrowest diameter in systole at the bases of the aortic valve cusps. This is most reliably accomplished using the parasternal long-axis view. Dividing the diameter in half then results in the radius of the open aortic valve. This area is assumed to be a circle and is determined by the standard plane geometric equation: area = r2.

Secondly, the distance the ejected blood travels may be calculated from the Doppler spectral recording. Since this is a measure of velocity over time, the flow velocity integral will result in the average velocity during systole.

Fig.3.7

As a result of knowing the average velocity, this may be normalized for one second and is an index of how far the blood has traveled. The method for calculation of cardiac output is demonstrated in Figure 3.7.

It is important to recognize that for proper calculation of cardiac output using this approach the beam must be as parallel to flow as possible. Alterations of a few degrees from parallel will result in lower Doppler velocity recordings and underestimation of cardiac output. Therefore, aortic outflow is best obtained from the apical or suprasternal approaches where the beam is nearly parallel to normal flow

It is also important to remember that the Doppler estimate of cardiac output is based on the square of the measured radius of the aorta. Any error in this measurement will be multiplied and may profoundly affect the resulting calculation.

Fig.3.8

Doppler estimates of cardiac output compare quite favorably with those obtained by other methods. Comparisons have been made with cardiac output estimated by the Fick principle at catheterization, with thermodiultion, as well as with a host of other approaches. In general, these studies show very good correlations, being within ±10% of the other method (Fig. 3.8). Cardiac output may also be determined from flow and diameter measurements through any of the other cardiac valves.

…Previous  |  Next…

HOME     |     TOP
BASIC ECHO: 2D Echo | Heart Valves | Heart Muscle | Congenital Disease
BASIC DOPPLER: Doppler Exam | Regurgitation | Stenosis | Flow Imaging

Site designed by Educational Media Services. Duke University Medical Center © 2000 Last updated 11/11/00