Philips
ECHO in Context
  Echo in Context Teleconferences: 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1998 | 1997
 LEARN THE BASICS: Echocardiography | Doppler

HOME

TELECONFRENCES
2004
The Changing Left Ventricle

2003
Aortic Valve Disease: New Dimensions in Evaluation and Management

2002
Heart Failure: Echo's Role in and Emerging Health Crisis

2001
Chest Pain in Children & Adults: The Role of Echo

2000
Mitral Regurgitation: New Concept

1998
The Falling Left Ventricle: Diastolic & Systolic Function

1997
Changing the Outcome of Coronary Artery Disease
ECHO GRAND ROUNDS
Digital Integration
LEARN THE BASICS
Echocardiography
Doppler Echo
VIDEO ARCHIVES

Chest Pain in Children and Adults

Mitral Regurgitation: New Concepts

Diastolic and Systolic Function

Changing the Outcome of CAD

BROADCAST SUPPLEMENTS
2000 MV
2001 Chest Pain
2002 Heart Failure



Severity of Valvular Insufficiency
Quantifying Valvular Insufficiency

It can now be generally accepted that Doppler echocardiography is a reliable method for the detection of the presence of valvular regurgitation. Doppler assessment of the severity of valvular regurgitation has also been moderately successful in comparison with angiographic techniques. The invasive "gold standard" for quantifying valvular insufficiency is the volume of regurgitant blood flow calculated by subtracting the total cardiac output, calculated angiographically, from the forward output (calculated by some other method-usually by the Fick principle). The regurgitant volume divided by the total angiographic stroke volume (i.e., the sum total of blood ejected forwards and backwards out of the left ventricle with each systole) is referred to as the regurgitant fraction and the formula is:

Regurgitant fraction =
total output — forward output.

This approach requires considerable time and effort and is not in widespread use in most catheterization laboratories.

The other commonly used measure of severity is a subjective grading (usually 0-4+) based on a visual evaluation of the amount of regurgitation judged by progressive opacification of the receiving chamber as seen by contrast angiography. Both methods have limitations, and there is only an approximate correlation between them. Thus, it has been difficult to find a suitable "gold standard" for comparison with Doppler methods. Remember that the subjective angiographic criteria are based upon progressive opacification of a receiving chamber, usually over several heart beats. When Doppler methods are used, regurgitation is detected on a beat-to-beat basis and differences between any comparisons should be expected.

Many approaches have been proposed to estimate the severity of valvular regurgitation using Doppler. One method relies on the use of PW Doppler to map the size and distribution of the regurgitant jet within a cardiac chamber and is the most common method used. Another is based upon the relationship of forward to reverse flow, while another has attempted to quantify the absolute flow through each valve orifice and then use these flow volumes to calculate the regurgitant fraction. The latter two methods are more complex and not easily performed by beginners to Doppler echocardiography. Another method based upon rate of descent of the velocity spectrum in diastole has been proposed for estimation of the severity of aortic insufficiency.

…Previous  |  Next…

HOME     |     TOP
BASIC ECHO: 2D Echo | Heart Valves | Heart Muscle | Congenital Disease
BASIC DOPPLER: Doppler Exam | Regurgitation | Stenosis | Flow Imaging

Site designed by Educational Media Services. Duke University Medical Center © 2000 Last updated 11/11/00